![]() |
| William Moulton Marston - Wonder Woman's creator and inventor of the lie detector. |
The other day I had an exhilarating conversation about Wonder Woman’s twin. Specifically, how satisfying it would be if Wonder Woman, Diana of the Amazon, warrior princess from a mythical queendom, had a twin sister who was a complete mess.
This
sister, unlike the dark-skinned Nubia (of precarious political correctness) who
appears occasionally in DC comics, would be the equal and opposite reaction to
Diana’s perfection – her strength wearying, her speed a vulnerability – often
devastating private property not safeguarding public welfare in Man’s World.
She
fights in arcane, piddling theaters; she’s obsessed with cutlery design,
biodynamic colons, public education and the ocean floor – which, being
super-powered, she can visit. She’s agitated and haggard, with high cholesterol
and insomnia. Her tiara often boomerangs back into her face. She shows up at
Wonder Woman and Steve Trevor’s door with mustard in her hair and one of her
gold wrist cuffs missing.
She
is: Blunder Woman.
In
the comics, Wonder Woman can remove her gold bracelets, greatly amplifying her
powers, but then she goes insane. Blunder Woman is half-there all the time. She’s
neurologically atypical. Without getting diagnostically specific, Blunder
Woman’s maladjustment, her strange habits and melancholy can be measured
scientifically.
She’s
a hero with an uncommon experience of the world, whose altered mind belies her
abilities. More Lionel Essrog of Lethem’s Motherless
Brooklyn or Haddon’s young hero of The
Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time – naturally peculiar – than
the Dark Phoenix, Venom and other characters overwhelmed by power or an alien
force, brainwashed, tortured or stricken with amnesia.
A
brain hero like Blunder Woman reflects where we are culturally with science.
The brain is the visible frontier. Sufficiently advanced technology, funding,
popular and media interest have coalesced in this neurological moment.
Disciplines like ecology and archeology are studied with comparatively diminished
fascination and support.
For
the most part, super heroes and villains were conceived in two dimensions and
have retained observable simplicity and purity in the present. Elevating the
untidy complications of the mind into the superhero hall allows us to deal with
neurological mysteries in the context of infinite dramatic sagas, if we elect
to.
We
choose our heroes. We draw attention and resources to causes we believe in and,
for humans, genetic and environmental variability has been the truest never-ending
story.
Blunder
Woman is my hero because she represents the brain’s possibilities, power and
fragility. She’s a picture of the imperfect: difference-celebrating, vice-affirming
and excuse-offering. She’s also a perfectionist cautionary tale – think, the
dark, flawless Black Swan (film or ballet) – and an uncomfortable reminder that
regardless of genius, talent or victory, some deficits, whether they’re seen as
such or not, are permanent.
Superheroes
appear when we need them, in narrative fiction and real life. Wonder Woman
arrived at super speed to save the day with her lasso of truth in 1941 at the
beginning of World War II, two decades after the 19th amendment
enfranchised women – a conscious embodiment of traditional strength, wisdom and
femininity. In 1999, humanity’s hacker messiah showed us we could be free, have
faith and fight for love in the new technological millennium, in The Matrix. There’s a fictional hero for
almost every social concern.
Fiction
is art, but like science, entrepreneurship and activism, it’s part of the work
we do to address the problems of our times. The struggle is to achieve, win and
not to repeat battles. We raise heroes so that, one day, we’ll no longer need
them.
Given
trends in neuroscience, gene therapy and biotech, it’s not preposterous to
imagine a more genetically homogenous population down the line. Neutralizing or
removing genes and protein receptors linked to disease, borrowing traits and
abilities from other species – perhaps even the cleansed, synthetic futures of
sci fi nightmare – how far we are from these possibilities varies, but they’re
all on the table.
We’ll
continue to use technology to make humans healthier. This troubles me because
historically unhealthy people (particularly neurologically unhealthy people)
have done amazing things. Extraordinary mental faculties pair with severe
mental and physical abnormalities. The frailties of our species (as it is
today) contribute to a diverse population and a volatility that incites passion
and inspires creation.
Reduced
genetic variation and fitter populations will alter the trajectory of our
world. It’s pointless to ask, with hands outstretched to a silent sky, if it’ll
be an improved world. Better to be part of its creation. Exploration is
inevitable. Don’t fear Gattaca.
Genetic destiny is a partial truth.
But
who are the heroes of the healthier, homogenous future? Certainly not Blunder
Woman.
Heroes
belong to the worlds they protect. Comic book stories continue decade after
decade (1) because they’re entertaining adventure stories. Villains and
circumstances are updated – sometimes completely re-written, as Wonder Woman
recently was – and heroes rise and fall in popularity. I grew up with Kitty
Pride, Martha Washington and Tank Girl. They also persist because (2) superheroes
are as immortal as the human qualities they embody. With near religious explanatory
suasion, they stand for: courage, loyalty, resilience …
Will
these traits be as important in the future? Will we crave adventure when our
brains interface directly with Wikipedia? After psychopharmacology births
unimaginable, safe mind-expanding drugs? Will we need superheroes at all?
I
don’t think we’ll see the end of them. At minimum, they’ll serve as
reminders of who we were – the flavors of our cultural past. Pick your
favorite. Not knowing what future heroes will be like is kind-of exciting.
Whoever they are, I expect fans will feel the same fondness for them that I
feel for Batman, Buffy, Blunder Woman and so many others.
